Andaman and Nicobar Islands’ Educational Odyssey: Tribal Inclusion, Reforms, and Isolation-Driven Challenges (1940–2020)
The Andaman and Nicobar Islands’ school education (1940–2020) achieved 86.6% literacy by 2011 via SSA, RTE, and tribal welfare. Tribal innovations like Eklavya schools and digital classrooms tackled isolation and diversity. Yet, only 42% of Class V students read at Class II levels (NAS 2017), reflecting quality gaps. Socio-political barriers (isolation, urban bias), economic constraints, and cultural exclusion (Nicobarese, Onge) persist. This analysis explores milestones, from the 1956 Regulation to digital programs, and Union Territory education trends.
Chaifry
5/2/20256 min read
The Andaman and Nicobar Islands’ school education system has advanced, with literacy rising from ~15% in 1941 to 86.6% by 2011, driven by Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), the Right to Education Act (RTE), and tribal welfare initiatives. Enrollment reached 95% by 2010, yet tribal areas like Nicobar lag at 70% literacy (2011 Census). As a British penal colony, education was restricted to settlers’ children, neglecting tribals. The Andaman and Nicobar Education Policy (1976) targeted universal access, but quality issues persist, with 42% of Class V students reading at Class II level (NAS 2017), due to isolation, teacher shortages, and migration. Poverty (10% below poverty line) and linguistic diversity (Hindi, Nicobarese, Tamil) add challenges. The islands’ trajectory, shaped by isolation and tribal diversity, benefits from initiatives like Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRS) in Car Nicobar. Across Union Territories, SSA and RTE boosted literacy (e.g., Chandigarh: 86.1%), with islands emphasizing tribal inclusion. Official metrics (86.6% literacy) mask tribal gaps. RTE, NEP 2020, and the 1956 Regulation offer hope, but success relies on improving infrastructure, ensuring equity, and implementing culturally responsive curricula to address tribal and remote disparities.
1940–1950: Colonial Penal Colony and Early Reforms
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: British colonial education targeted settlers’ children in Port Blair, with missionary schools for non-tribals. Post-1947, the First Five-Year Plan (1951–56) allocated 7% for education, targeting tribal areas (Andaman Education Reports).
Infrastructure Development: Schools grew from ~20 to 50, concentrated in Port Blair (Andaman Education Census).
Literacy Improvements: Literacy rose from ~15% to 20.1% by 1951, with tribal literacy at ~5% (Census 1951).
Curriculum Advancements: English and Hindi were used, with basic literacy for settlers.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Colonial policies excluded tribes like Jarawa. Japanese occupation (1942–1945) disrupted schooling.
Economic Constraints: Low budgets (1% of UT GDP) prioritized penal administration, neglecting tribal schools.
Cultural Factors: Tribal languages (Nicobarese, Shompen) were sidelined, and isolation limited access.
Administrative Issues: Teacher shortages (5% trained) and Port Blair-centric control hindered progress.
UT Education Context: Delhi’s colonial schools achieved 30% literacy (1951). Puducherry lagged under French rule.
Tribal Narrative: In Car Nicobar, missionary schools enrolled 200 Nicobarese students by 1947, using English.
Tribal Act Context: The Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Regulation, 1956, was drafted, later funding tribal schools.
Historical and Political Context: Penal colony legacy and post-independence integration prioritized settler education, neglecting tribes.
1950–1960: Post-Independence Expansion
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: The Kothari Commission (1964–66) influenced tribal education policies. The 1956 Regulation protected tribal rights, indirectly supporting schools.
Infrastructure Development: Schools reached 100 by 1960, with 30% in tribal areas like Little Andaman (Andaman Education Census).
Literacy Improvements: Literacy rose to 30.5% by 1961, with tribal literacy at ~10% (Census 1961).
Curriculum Advancements: NPE 1968 introduced vocational skills, with fishing in tribal curricula.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Settler-tribal tensions limited access in Nicobar. Central neglect persisted.
Economic Constraints: Budgets (1.5% of UT GDP) were inadequate for remote islands.
Cultural Factors: Resistance to Hindi-medium schools in Nicobarese areas increased dropouts.
Administrative Issues: Teacher absenteeism (20%) and lack of training (15% certified) affected tribal schools.
UT Education Context: Chandigarh’s planned growth pushed literacy to 40% (1961). Lakshadweep faced isolation challenges.
Tribal Narrative: Mobile schools in Great Nicobar served 500 tribal students, using Nicobarese teachers.
Tribal Act Context: The 1956 Regulation allocated ₹10 lakh for 50+ tribal schools, promoting Nicobarese and Onge languages.
Historical and Political Context: Integration and tribal protection policies shaped education as a tool for inclusion.
1960–1970: Union Territory Consolidation
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: The Andaman and Nicobar Education Policy (1976) targeted remote islands. Operation Blackboard (1978) equipped schools.
Infrastructure Development: Schools reached 200 by 1970, with 40% electrified in Port Blair but 10% in tribal areas (UDISE 1970).
Literacy Improvements: Literacy rose to 45.7% by 1971, with tribal literacy at ~20% (Census 1971).
Curriculum Advancements: Environmental studies reflected the islands’ marine ecology.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Tribal isolation in Sentinel Islands disrupted schooling. Settler bias persisted.
Economic Constraints: Education spending (2% of UT GDP) was insufficient for scattered islands.
Cultural Factors: Early marriages and tribal migration increased dropouts.
Administrative Issues: Overcrowded classrooms and untrained teachers (20% certified) reduced quality.
UT Education Context: Delhi’s urban focus reached 55% literacy (1971). Daman & Diu lagged due to colonial neglect.
Tribal Narrative: Community radio in Nicobarese in Car Nicobar boosted attendance by 8%. Tent-based schools in Diglipur served tribal children.
Tribal Act Context: The 1956 Regulation funded 100+ schools with ₹20 lakh, enhancing access for Nicobarese and Jarawa students.
Historical and Political Context: Central governance and tribal welfare prioritized education, but isolation remained a barrier.
1970–1980: NPE 1986 and Tribal Focus
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: NPE 1986 expanded Operation Blackboard, equipping 50% of schools with teaching aids. Tribal welfare policies targeted Nicobar.
Infrastructure Development: Schools reached 300 by 1980, with 60% having water access in Port Blair (UDISE 1980).
Literacy Improvements: Literacy reached 60.2% by 1981, with tribal literacy at ~35% (Census 1981).
Curriculum Advancements: NCF 1988 promoted critical thinking, with Nicobarese modules.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Tribal exclusion persisted in remote islands. Urban bias favored Port Blair.
Economic Constraints: High private spending (₹30 per capita, NSS 2004–05) strained tribal households.
Cultural Factors: Linguistic exclusion (Shompen, Onge) increased alienation.
Administrative Issues: Teacher vacancies (15%) persisted in tribal areas.
UT Education Context: Chandigarh’s model schools reached 70% literacy (1981). Lakshadweep improved via central grants.
Tribal Narrative: Eklavya schools in Little Andaman boosted enrollment by 10%. Solar-powered classrooms in Car Nicobar addressed power shortages.
Tribal Act Context: The 1956 Regulation funded 150+ schools with ₹30 lakh, using tribal languages as mediums.
Historical and Political Context: Central policies and tribal welfare strengthened education, but geographical barriers persisted.
1980–1990: SSA and Post-Tsunami Recovery
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: SSA (2000) universalized elementary education, achieving 90% enrollment. Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV) targeted tribal girls.
Infrastructure Development: Schools reached 400 by 1990, with 70% having toilets in Port Blair (UDISE 1990).
Literacy Improvements: Literacy reached 73.8% by 1991, with tribal literacy at ~50% (Census 1991).
Curriculum Advancements: NCF 2000 emphasized constructivist learning, with tribal culture modules.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Tsunami (2004) disrupted Nicobar schools. Settler bias persisted.
Economic Constraints: Poverty (12% below poverty line) increased tribal dropouts.
Cultural Factors: Tribal languages were underrepresented in curricula.
Administrative Issues: Rote learning and disrupted schooling reduced quality.
UT Education Context: Delhi’s urban growth pushed literacy to 80% (1991). Dadra & Nagar Haveli faced infrastructure gaps.
Tribal Narrative: Mobile libraries in Campbell Bay reached 15% more students. Community-led schools in Car Nicobar used Nicobarese, reducing dropouts by 12%.
Tribal Act Context: The 1956 Regulation (amended 1985) expanded to 200+ schools, with bilingual primers in Nicobarese and Onge.
Historical and Political Context: Tsunami recovery and SSA aligned with national goals, advancing tribal education.
1990–2000: RTE and Infrastructure Growth
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: RTE (2009) reduced out-of-school rates to 3%. Andaman Education Rules (2005) aligned with SSA.
Infrastructure Development: Schools reached 500 by 2000, with pupil-teacher ratio at 20:1 (UDISE 2000). ICT labs covered 20% of Port Blair schools.
Literacy Improvements: Literacy reached 81.3% by 2001, with tribal literacy at ~60% (Census 2001).
Curriculum Advancements: NCF 2005 promoted inclusive education, with tribal folklore in curricula.
UT Improvements: Chandigarh’s smart classrooms set a benchmark (82.6% literacy, 2001). Puducherry and Delhi followed with 80% enrollment.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Tribal isolation disrupted Great Nicobar schools. Port Blair bias persisted.
Economic Constraints: Rural-urban spending gaps (₹25 rural vs. ₹80 urban, NSS 2004–05) limited tribal progress.
Cultural Factors: Tribal migration disrupted schooling continuity.
Administrative Issues: Teacher training lagged; 42% of students struggled with basic skills (NAS 2017).
Tribal Narrative: The Andaman Tribal Education Project (2008) built 50 micro-schools in Diglipur, enrolling 2,000 tribal students.
Tribal Act Context: The 1956 Regulation funded infrastructure and teacher training, reducing dropout rates by 7% in tribal areas.
Historical and Political Context: Post-tsunami stability and RTE advanced equity, but tribal challenges remained.
2000–2010: NEP 2020 and Digital Push
Milestones:
Policy Reforms: NEP 2020 introduced a 5+3+3+4 structure, emphasizing Nicobarese and Hindi. Samagra Shiksha scaled up tribal schools.
Infrastructure Development: Schools reached 600 by 2010, with 80% having smart classrooms in Port Blair (UDISE 2019–20).
Literacy Improvements: Literacy reached 86.6% by 2011, with tribal literacy at ~70% (Census 2011).
Curriculum Advancements: NEP 2020 integrated coding, tribal heritage, and experiential learning.
UT Improvements: Delhi’s Education Revolution inspired UTs, with Chandigarh at 86.1% and Puducherry at 85.9% literacy (2011). The islands focused on tribal inclusion.
Hurdles:
Socio-Political Challenges: Isolation and single-teacher schools (100 in tribal areas) increased dropouts. Urban bias persisted.
Economic Constraints: High private coaching costs strained tribal households. Public spending (3.5% of GDP) faced pressures.
Cultural Factors: Inadequate training in Shompen and Onge alienated students.
Administrative Issues: Rote learning and COVID-19 digital divides (40% tribal students lacked access, 2020 data) hindered progress.
Tribal Narrative: The Andaman Digital Education Program (2019) introduced e-learning in Car Nicobar, increasing pass rates by 8%. “Shiksha Saathis” in Little Andaman trained tribal youth, reducing vacancies by 10%.
Tribal Act Context: The 1956 Regulation funded bilingual curricula and infrastructure, boosting tribal enrollment by 10%.
Historical and Political Context: Central governance and NEP 2020 aimed for modernization, but island connectivity gaps remained.
Reflection on Broader Historical and Political Framework
The Andaman and Nicobar Islands’ school education evolved through phases:
Colonial and Early Independence (1940–1970): Penal colony and settler focus neglected tribes, with missionary schools dominating.
Tribal Inclusion (1970–2000): SSA and the 1956 Regulation prioritized access, but isolation stalled progress.
Modernization and Equity (2000–2020): RTE, NEP 2020, and tribal welfare advanced quality, but tribal gaps persisted.
© 2025. All rights reserved.