The Deal Review: Elle Kennedy's Fake-Dating Romance

Elle Kennedy’s The Deal, first published in 2015 and the opening novel in the popular Off-Campus series, belongs to the new-adult sports romance tradition that has found a wide readership among young adults navigating college life, identity, and intimacy. Kennedy, a Canadian author known for blending steamy romance with emotional depth, places her story at Briar University, where hockey captain Garrett Graham and music major Hannah Wells strike an unlikely bargain.

The novel’s central claim is that genuine connection requires trust built through honesty, consent, and the slow work of healing past wounds rather than through performance or social convenience. Readers should turn to this book because it treats trauma, academic pressure, and the awkwardness of young adulthood with unusual directness, offering a story that is both entertaining and quietly instructive about what it means to feel safe with another person.

The narrative alternates between Hannah’s and Garrett’s first-person perspectives. Hannah is a scholarship student, a gifted singer who works at a diner and rehearses for a winter music showcase. She carries the lasting effects of a sexual assault that occurred when she was fifteen. Garrett is the star centre and captain of the Briar hockey team, the son of a legendary NHL player whose public image hides private cruelty. When Garrett fails a midterm in their shared philosophy class, he needs a tutor to keep his eligibility. Hannah needs help becoming more visible to Justin Kohl, the football player she has quietly admired. They form a deal: she tutors him, and he pretends to date her so that Justin will notice her.

“Most of the popular kids are total douchebags. Case in point—Garrett Graham, the other star athlete in this class. Dude walks around like he owns the place” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 3). Hannah’s early assessment sets the tone of wary distance. Yet the arrangement forces proximity. Study sessions turn into conversations. Parties become shared territory. The fake relationship begins to feel less fake. Kennedy integrates humour with heavier material without letting either cancel the other. Hannah’s internal voice is sharp and self-aware: “I was raped at a party. God, I hate that word. Rape. It’s one of the few words in the English language that has a visceral effect when you hear it” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 23). She continues, “Years of therapy helped me see that the burden of blame lies solely on him. There was something wrong with him. Not me. Never me. And the most important lesson I learned is that I’m not a victim—I’m a survivor” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 23). Later she reflects on the lingering effects: “And there’s a reason I don’t go to many parties. I guess it’s my version of PTSD” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 24).

Garrett’s chapters reveal a different kind of pressure. Hockey is not simply a sport; it is the arena where he both proves himself and risks becoming the man his father was. “Hockey is my entire life,” he says at one point, explaining why relationships have always felt secondary (Kennedy, 2015, p. 35). Yet the more time he spends with Hannah, the more the performance of carefree confidence cracks. He becomes protective without being possessive, patient without being condescending. One of the novel’s quieter strengths is the way it shows consent as an ongoing conversation rather than a single checkpoint. When physical intimacy becomes possible, the text slows down. Hannah’s fear is treated as legitimate; Garrett’s willingness to stop, wait, or change course is presented as ordinary decency rather than heroic exceptionalism.

The supporting cast supplies both comic relief and emotional ballast. Allie, Hannah’s roommate, is fiercely loyal. Logan and Dean, Garrett’s teammates and housemates, provide the chaotic energy of a shared off-campus house. Text exchanges between Hannah and Garrett capture the shift from hostility to affection with precise comic timing. “Him: Confession: I deleted all the 1 Direction from your iPod when u were in the can. You’re welcome. Me: WHAT?? I’m going to kiss u! Him: With tongue?” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 112). Later Garrett tells her, “Baby, I could watch you watching paint dry, and I still wouldn’t be bored” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 198). Hannah observes of his pillow mountain, “I’ve never met anyone who sleeps with so many pillows. Maybe he needs them to cradle his massive ego” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 145). When tension rises, the banter sharpens: “I want to murder him in his sleep, A. No, I want to murder him when he’s awake so he can see the joy on my face when I do it” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 87). Garrett’s protectiveness appears in practical form: “Look, I’m the DD tonight, but I’m offering to be more than just your driver. I’ll be your bodyguard, and your bartender, and most importantly, your friend” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 156).

As the relationship deepens, both characters confront the ground reality of their histories. Hannah states, “I’m not normal. I’m broken. I keep telling myself that the rape didn’t destroy me, but it did” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 210). Garrett’s fear of inherited violence surfaces: the public hero who is a private abuser. The novel does not suggest that love erases trauma. Instead it shows that safety, repeated and reliable, creates the conditions in which healing can continue. One of the more affecting lines arrives when Garrett realises how thoroughly Hannah has entered his life: “Sometimes people sneak up on you and suddenly you don’t know how you ever lived without them” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 278). Another captures the shift in Hannah’s self-perception: “It’s like an entire Fourth of July fireworks display going off inside me” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 245). Garrett’s frustration at his earlier blindness is plain: “How did I go so long without noticing you, damn it?” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 189). Hannah’s refusal to be defined solely by trauma appears in her determination to reclaim ordinary pleasures: “I want to feel normal again. I need to know if I can” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 167).

Additional moments underline the novel’s attention to trust. “Sex is all about trust,” Garrett observes. “Even if you don’t love the other person, even if it’s just a hookup, it still takes a serious amount of trust to open yourself up” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 220). Hannah’s wariness of vulnerability is rooted in earlier betrayal: “When you’ve already been disappointed by the one person you’re supposed to trust most in your life, you’re not exactly keen on giving people any kind of ammunition over you” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 98). The fake-dating premise itself becomes a running joke and then a source of genuine feeling. When outsiders question the relationship, Hannah responds with dry humour: “I’m perfectly content with my current rung on the social ladder, but thanks so much for offering to ‘boost my popularity’” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 132). Garrett’s own history of casual encounters is treated without glamour; the contrast with Hannah’s careful pace is never used to shame either character. Later reflections on time and change surface: “I’ve noticed that as I get older, time seems to fly by in hyper-speed. You blink, and a week has passed” (Kennedy, 2015, p. 301). The novel closes on a note of hard-won stability rather than fairy-tale perfection, acknowledging that both characters still carry their pasts even as they move forward together.

The novel’s strengths are clear. Kennedy writes dialogue that feels spoken rather than constructed. The dual points of view allow readers to see the same events through different emotional filters, which deepens rather than confuses the story. The treatment of sexual trauma is unusually careful for the genre: it is neither erased nor exploited for melodrama. Consent is modelled repeatedly in scenes that could easily have been rushed. The college setting is rendered with specific detail: the pressure of maintaining athletic eligibility, the scholarship student’s financial precarity, the social hierarchies of a campus where athletes occupy a privileged tier. Secondary characters feel like people rather than plot devices. The humour is often physical and situational, grounded in the absurdities of shared housing and text-message misunderstandings.

Weaknesses exist. The supporting male characters sometimes lean on familiar “player with a heart of gold” patterns that the central romance itself works hard to complicate. Justin Kohl remains underdeveloped, functioning more as a catalyst than a fully realised person. Certain plot turns involving blackmail and public exposure feel more conventional than the careful emotional work that surrounds them. Intersectional analysis is limited; the novel’s world is largely white and middle-class, and questions of race, class beyond scholarship status, or queer experience receive little sustained attention. The resolution of Garrett’s family conflict, while satisfying on an emotional level, arrives with a speed that some readers may find abrupt. These gaps do not erase the book’s accomplishments, yet they remain part of the ground reality of a commercial romance written within the conventions of its category.

Why Indian Youth Readers Must Read This Book

Indian college and university students often move through an education system still dominated by high-stakes examinations, rote learning, and intense competition for limited seats and jobs. The pressure to perform academically can leave little room for conversations about emotional safety, consent, or the slow recovery from personal trauma. The Deal offers a useful counterpoint. Hannah’s scholarship status and her need to balance studies, work, and artistic ambition will feel familiar to many students who carry financial as well as academic expectations. Garrett’s struggle to maintain eligibility while managing family pressure mirrors the experience of young people whose futures seem to rest on a single set of results or a single career path.

The novel’s careful handling of trauma is especially relevant. In many Indian households and institutions, discussions of sexual violence remain muted or framed in ways that shift responsibility onto the survivor. Hannah’s repeated insistence that the blame was never hers, and her long process of reclaiming physical and emotional agency, provides a model of language and self-regard that is still too rarely available in mainstream Indian popular culture aimed at young adults. The book does not present therapy or friendship as magic solutions; it shows them as necessary, imperfect, ongoing supports. That realism can serve as a quiet wake-up call for readers who have been told to “move on” without adequate space to process what happened.

Social expectations around dating, reputation, and “suitable” relationships also find echoes here. The fake-dating premise dramatises the gap between public performance and private feeling, a gap many young Indians navigate when family approval, peer judgment, and personal desire pull in different directions. The novel’s insistence that consent is continuous and that stopping is always allowed offers a practical ethic that can be useful far beyond the specific setting of an American college campus. In an environment where job market pressures and the race to keep playing catch-up often leave little time for self-knowledge, the book’s slower emotional tempo is itself instructive. It suggests that competence in one domain (studies, sport, music) does not automatically produce competence in intimacy, and that the latter requires its own deliberate practice.

Finally, the found-family dynamic among the housemates and teammates illustrates a form of support that many first-generation college students create for themselves when traditional family structures feel distant or judgmental. The loyalty, teasing, and practical care within that group model a version of belonging that does not depend on blood or status. For readers navigating the transition from highly structured school environments into the relative freedom and isolation of higher education or early career life, that portrait of chosen community can feel both recognisable and aspirational.

In the end The Deal succeeds because it refuses to treat its central characters as either pure victims or pure heroes. Hannah and Garrett are allowed to be inconsistent, defensive, funny, and brave in the same chapter. The novel’s thesis remains modest yet valuable: trust is built in small, repeated acts of honesty and respect, and healing is less a destination than a practice. Kennedy does not claim that romance solves systemic problems or personal history. She simply shows two people learning how to be safe with each other, and in doing so she offers younger readers a story that respects both their desire for pleasure and their need for dignity. That combination of heat and care is rarer than it should be, and it is the reason the book continues to find new audiences a decade after its first appearance.

@ 2025 Chaifry. All rights reserved.